6f09 Posted December 8, 2014 Report Share Posted December 8, 2014 Is 07GT02c black sgt show at the Aug.2006 National Ford dealers meeting VDO the same as 07GT02p black sgt wide body that Shelby is selling /sold? Thanks GOD Bless Jim & Judy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2010KonaBlueGT Posted December 9, 2014 Report Share Posted December 9, 2014 Is 07GT02c black sgt show at the Aug.2006 National Ford dealers meeting VDO the same as 07GT02p black sgt wide body that Shelby is selling /sold? Thanks GOD Bless Jim & Judy 07GT02C designates the car as the 2nd 2007 Shelby GT CONCEPT (the C at the end designates it as a Concept car). The P at the end of the other designates it as the 2nd 2007 Shelby GT PROTOTYPE. If both have a CSM tag, they are indeed two separate cars. It's been my observation that Shelby American used the Concept designation for a car that did not yet exist and used the Prototype for a car that already exists but most likely not for that year (See: 2007 Super Snake Prototype vs the later 2010+ MY Concepts for examples). Phill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6f09 Posted December 9, 2014 Author Report Share Posted December 9, 2014 thanks Jim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeffJ Posted December 9, 2014 Report Share Posted December 9, 2014 We will need somebody from SAI to chime in. While I totally agree with what Phill is saying and his logic is 100% on, in this case, I do believe they took the 2007 "C"oncept car and then changed it to the "P"rototype car for the wide body project. All I know is that I want it, as that is an awesome looking machine, but that's not going to happen. When I can afford it, I'll be moving on to the new GT350. But maybe, convert my H to the only wide body GT-H also. It's already gone way past stock with the engine and many other things, so why not? Sexy, sexy: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry T Posted December 9, 2014 Report Share Posted December 9, 2014 Wide body Shelby's look amazing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HARALD KELLEY Posted December 9, 2014 Report Share Posted December 9, 2014 We will need somebody from SAI to chime in. While I totally agree with what Phill is saying and his logic is 100% on, in this case, I do believe they took the 2007 "C"oncept car and then changed it to the "P"rototype car for the wide body project. All I know is that I want it, as that is an awesome looking machine, but that's not going to happen. When I can afford it, I'll be moving on to the new GT350. But maybe, convert my H to the only wide body GT-H also. It's already gone way past stock with the engine and many other things, so why not? Sexy, sexy: Wish I had liquid cash. Every time I see it in Vegas I Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6f09 Posted December 9, 2014 Author Report Share Posted December 9, 2014 very cooool 07GT02C tag was in the engine compartment 07GT02P was on the dash both cars have the std. GT rear bump 07GT02C has GT on front fender 07GT02p has "Powered by Ford"on front fender thanks GOD Bless Jim & Judy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2010KonaBlueGT Posted December 9, 2014 Report Share Posted December 9, 2014 We will need somebody from SAI to chime in. While I totally agree with what Phill is saying and his logic is 100% on, in this case, I do believe they took the 2007 "C"oncept car and then changed it to the "P"rototype car for the wide body project. That's what I think they did too. "Eliminated" the C car and turned it into the P car. P is for an existing platform so the P car was built to showcase the wide body application, IMO. Which is why I said, "If both have a CSM tag, they are indeed two separate cars." Phill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6f09 Posted December 10, 2014 Author Report Share Posted December 10, 2014 could be? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.