2006GT500 Posted September 8, 2009 Report Share Posted September 8, 2009 I do like the '69-'70 "Shelby" Mustangs, but this is a little.......awful IMHO. http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2007-Mustan...6.c0.m245#v4-35 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SicShelby Posted September 8, 2009 Report Share Posted September 8, 2009 I do like the '60-'70 "Shelby" Mustangs, but this is a little.......awful IMHO. http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2007-Mustan...6.c0.m245#v4-35 I wasn't completely "excited" about it either, ha-ha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shelbymotorsports Posted September 8, 2009 Report Share Posted September 8, 2009 This car started out as a 2007 Mustang Shelby GT 350 Oh my they modified a one of none car. How can you do a 1969-70 Shelby and ignore the rear valance exhaust? Not sure how those bumpers can be legal in todays world. Can anyone make out the CSM number so that this gets into the registry? Steve Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clark17357 Posted September 8, 2009 Report Share Posted September 8, 2009 Can anyone make out the CSM number so that this gets into the registry?Steve I cannot make out the last number. The number is either 07SGT0786 or 07SGT0789. Jim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drswiger Posted September 8, 2009 Report Share Posted September 8, 2009 I cannot make out the last number. The number is either 07SGT0786 or 07SGT0789. Jim UGLY Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
08SGT1977 Posted September 8, 2009 Report Share Posted September 8, 2009 This car started out as a 2007 Mustang Shelby GT 350 Oh my they modified a one of none car. How can you do a 1969-70 Shelby and ignore the rear valance exhaust? Not sure how those bumpers can be legal in todays world. Can anyone make out the CSM number so that this gets into the registry? Steve I love it. I wish the tail lights were like 69/70 too. I know I am in the minority but I think it looks awesome as well as the original ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2006GT500 Posted September 8, 2009 Author Report Share Posted September 8, 2009 Wish they had a picture next to one of the originals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grsybtch Posted September 8, 2009 Report Share Posted September 8, 2009 I didn't have much of an opinion either way on it until I saw they destroyed a Shelby GT to make it......... :barf: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Hawkins Posted September 8, 2009 Report Share Posted September 8, 2009 I like it. I would not pay that kind of money if I can get a GT 500 for the same price. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shack Posted September 8, 2009 Report Share Posted September 8, 2009 I cannot make out the last number. The number is either 07SGT0786 or 07SGT0789. Jim My take is 07SGT0786. Guess the Shelby GTs just got that much more rare. Andy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingCobra666 Posted September 8, 2009 Report Share Posted September 8, 2009 Its IS interesting....something looks off though, the rear overhang is too long, wheelbase too short. I'm not a big fan of these types of hatchet jobs but obviously someone wanted it done so what the hell. I would rather have a GT/SC with a set of CS 69's on it. :happy feet: One man's beauty is anothers abomination... KC666 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexandros Posted September 8, 2009 Report Share Posted September 8, 2009 I personally do not like it.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matts Posted September 8, 2009 Report Share Posted September 8, 2009 I love it! I'm sorry but I think it looks great! There's still a lot of things that I would do to make it look "right." Other than that it would be a great project! Thanks for posting! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brisk_tea Posted September 8, 2009 Report Share Posted September 8, 2009 it's better than the other ones for earlier models that were in 5.0 if it had the 5.4/6 speed, it would interest me more... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Hawkins Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 Its IS interesting....something looks off though, the rear overhang is too long, wheelbase too short. I'm not a big fan of these types of hatchet jobs but obviously someone wanted it done so what the hell. I would rather have a GT/SC with a set of CS 69's on it. :happy feet: One man's beauty is anothers abomination... KC666 They should have produced the Shelby Side Scoops for it as well as the Tail Lights and center Exit Exhaust, plus the 69 Shelby did not use that Rear Spoiler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slabo Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 :barf: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RACERX009 Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 It's not perfect but hell it's nice to be able to build something like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
08SGT1977 Posted September 9, 2009 Report Share Posted September 9, 2009 I didn't have much of an opinion either way on it until I saw they destroyed a Shelby GT to make it......... :barf: I thought I read it was a salvaged SGT which would be acceptable. Not a new one though, use a Mustang GT instead. "hatchet job"! you guys are funny! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matts Posted September 10, 2009 Report Share Posted September 10, 2009 I thought I read it was a salvaged SGT which would be acceptable. Not a new one though, use a Mustang GT instead. "hatchet job"! you guys are funny! I call him and asked him if it was and he said "nope it was a clean title we bought it for 28,000 a year and a half ago with 800 miles on the speedometer." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
XLR8 Posted September 10, 2009 Report Share Posted September 10, 2009 Listing has been removed or is no longer available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.