ShelbyGT/SC Posted August 6, 2008 Report Share Posted August 6, 2008 I have been wanting to ask about this for a while but keep forgetting. Who's using zMax and what are your thoughts? I have been using it for a while and have over 6200 miles on my car. Although I haven't pulled the engine apart, I am hopeful that it's helping a great deal. I at least feel much more comfortable starting my car after it has been sitting for a few days (or weeks in the winter) knowing that the zMAX is helping protect the engine - especially the upper parts after sitting. A few months ago I watched a special on one of the Saturday morning car shows (I think it was 2 Guy's Garage) where the whole show was about zMAX. I was very impressed by the technology and how it protects an engine and other internals. Your thoughts and successes??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ingram4868 Posted August 6, 2008 Report Share Posted August 6, 2008 Junk, Crap, Snake Oil. THe best protection is already available by using the full synthetic motor oil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilmor Posted August 6, 2008 Report Share Posted August 6, 2008 I don't think, in the end result, it will prove to be a benefit to you. Will you ever really know what it has done, or did, for your engine? If it gives you peace of mind, however, what the heck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boss Doctor Posted August 6, 2008 Report Share Posted August 6, 2008 Junk, Crap, Snake Oil. Snake Oil! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frydguy79 Posted August 6, 2008 Report Share Posted August 6, 2008 Adam, isn't zMax a erectile med? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShelbyGT/SC Posted August 6, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2008 LOL Fortunately I have no idea and hope to never have to do the research. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stump_breaker Posted August 6, 2008 Report Share Posted August 6, 2008 I thought at one time I saw CS endorsing zMAX. This has been awhile ago though. "The Federal Trade Commission has filed suit in U. S. District Court seeking to halt false and misleading advertising for zMax auto additives and has asked the court to order refunds to consumers who bought the products. The agency alleges that enhanced performance claims for the product are unsubstantiated, that tests cited to support performance claims actually demonstrated that motor oil treated with zMax produced more than twice as much bearing corrosion than motor oil alone, and that the three different products - an engine additive, a fuel line additive and a transmission additive - were all actually tinted mineral oil. zMax is manufactured by Oil-Chem, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Speedway Motorsports, Inc. Speedway, based in Concord, North Carolina, operates NASCAR race tracks in the South and in California, in addition to marketing the zMax products." clicky clicky Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mywickedshelby Posted August 6, 2008 Report Share Posted August 6, 2008 Ive seen those zmax commercials with ol Shel saying he puts it in all his cars. I always took it as an endorsement deal rather than a dynamic product becuase we only got a brochere with our cars, they didnt actually use it on the SGTs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ingram4868 Posted August 6, 2008 Report Share Posted August 6, 2008 I thought at one time I saw CS endorsing zMAX. This has been awhile ago though. "The Federal Trade Commission has filed suit in U. S. District Court seeking to halt false and misleading advertising for zMax auto additives and has asked the court to order refunds to consumers who bought the products. The agency alleges that enhanced performance claims for the product are unsubstantiated, that tests cited to support performance claims actually demonstrated that motor oil treated with zMax produced more than twice as much bearing corrosion than motor oil alone, and that the three different products - an engine additive, a fuel line additive and a transmission additive - were all actually tinted mineral oil. zMax is manufactured by Oil-Chem, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Speedway Motorsports, Inc. Speedway, based in Concord, North Carolina, operates NASCAR race tracks in the South and in California, in addition to marketing the zMax products." clicky clicky Refunds? In that case I bought 25 boxes of the stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShelbyGT/SC Posted August 6, 2008 Author Report Share Posted August 6, 2008 I thought at one time I saw CS endorsing zMAX. This has been awhile ago though. "The Federal Trade Commission has filed suit in U. S. District Court seeking to halt false and misleading advertising for zMax auto additives and has asked the court to order refunds to consumers who bought the products. The agency alleges that enhanced performance claims for the product are unsubstantiated, that tests cited to support performance claims actually demonstrated that motor oil treated with zMax produced more than twice as much bearing corrosion than motor oil alone, and that the three different products - an engine additive, a fuel line additive and a transmission additive - were all actually tinted mineral oil. zMax is manufactured by Oil-Chem, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Speedway Motorsports, Inc. Speedway, based in Concord, North Carolina, operates NASCAR race tracks in the South and in California, in addition to marketing the zMax products." clicky clicky OUCH! The show looked really convincing. So how much power boost do I get if I put mineral oil in my gas tank? Let's all just pretend that I never posted this topic. LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Hawkins Posted August 6, 2008 Report Share Posted August 6, 2008 OUCH! The show looked really convincing. So how much power boost do I get if I put mineral oil in my gas tank? Let's all just pretend that I never posted this topic. LOL See what you did..............this is way your not allowed outside by yourself...................................... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Hawkins Posted August 6, 2008 Report Share Posted August 6, 2008 I thought at one time I saw CS endorsing zMAX. This has been awhile ago though. "The Federal Trade Commission has filed suit in U. S. District Court seeking to halt false and misleading advertising for zMax auto additives and has asked the court to order refunds to consumers who bought the products. The agency alleges that enhanced performance claims for the product are unsubstantiated, that tests cited to support performance claims actually demonstrated that motor oil treated with zMax produced more than twice as much bearing corrosion than motor oil alone, and that the three different products - an engine additive, a fuel line additive and a transmission additive - were all actually tinted mineral oil. zMax is manufactured by Oil-Chem, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Speedway Motorsports, Inc. Speedway, based in Concord, North Carolina, operates NASCAR race tracks in the South and in California, in addition to marketing the zMax products." clicky clicky I wandered what happened to the commercials............................ now we know. David. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColdwaterHotrod Posted August 6, 2008 Report Share Posted August 6, 2008 I thought at one time I saw CS endorsing zMAX. This has been awhile ago though. "The Federal Trade Commission has filed suit in U. S. District Court seeking to halt false and misleading advertising for zMax auto additives and has asked the court to order refunds to consumers who bought the products. The agency alleges that enhanced performance claims for the product are unsubstantiated, that tests cited to support performance claims actually demonstrated that motor oil treated with zMax produced more than twice as much bearing corrosion than motor oil alone, and that the three different products - an engine additive, a fuel line additive and a transmission additive - were all actually tinted mineral oil. zMax is manufactured by Oil-Chem, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Speedway Motorsports, Inc. Speedway, based in Concord, North Carolina, operates NASCAR race tracks in the South and in California, in addition to marketing the zMax products." clicky clicky In 2003 it got reversed http://www.zmax.com/ftc.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColdwaterHotrod Posted August 6, 2008 Report Share Posted August 6, 2008 IMHO from working with heat treated steel, I think zMax's claim works similar to case hardening of steel. I’m not sure what grade our steel is for the engine blocks, but the surface of flame-hardened medium-carbon type steel will have a poorer wear resistance then that of the same piece of steel with a higher richness of carbon-content of equal hardness. Most mild steels do not contain enough carbon in them to be able to just heat them up to make them harder. You can force carbon into the skin of metal to produce a piece of mild steel which has a harder outer casing containing more carbon than its inner core. Granted our internals don’t turn cherry red or bright red like they do doing heat treat but I think the theroy is close. I think zMax has found a way which allows this micro lube to soak into the outer surface when the motor & parts get hot (just like in the commercial). During Heat treating you can produce a carbon rich skin on metal to a case thickness of about 1mm thick. Case hardening is used to add hardness to outside or resist wear and tear, but yet it’s softer on the inside to resist shock or sudden blows. If carbonization can be done to metal, why do you have a hard time believing that someone can’t figure out a way to allow a micro-lubricant to be absorbed into metal when heated up? Personally I think it does work because I have cross sectioned many parts & looked at them under a microscope in a lab to verify the induction of carbon into them for warranty claims & if carbon can be added to the skin so can a micro lubricant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stump_breaker Posted August 6, 2008 Report Share Posted August 6, 2008 In 2003 it got reversed http://www.zmax.com/ftc.html Isn't that interesting. Here is a copy of the final order. The last three pages where they reference proof of the claims on their website but demand confidentiality are pretty interesting. clicky FTC news release of settlement They still got spanked for a million dollars. It seems their claims went very general after the suit rather than the specifics the FTC were accusing them of stating but according to the letter what they do claim is accurate. I'm not saying it does or does not work. Just reporting my findings. I'm indifferent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moabman Posted August 6, 2008 Report Share Posted August 6, 2008 I thought I heard that their oil additive was a PTFE with a carrier. PTFE is another name for the trademarked Dupont polymer called "Teflon". I think that if this was a big benefit, the lubricant manufacturers would already include it in their additives that they put in their oil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AstroDan Posted August 6, 2008 Report Share Posted August 6, 2008 I’m not sure what grade our steel is for the engine blocks, but the surface of flame-hardened medium-carbon type steel will have a poorer wear resistance then that of the same piece of steel with a higher richness of carbon-content of equal hardness. The SGT block is aluminum... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Hawkins Posted August 6, 2008 Report Share Posted August 6, 2008 In 2003 it got reversed http://www.zmax.com/ftc.html From 2001: The FTC's complaint alleges that the defendants did not possess and rely on reasonable substantiation for the following claims in the infomercial, on the Web site and in brochures that zMax: increases gas mileage; increases gas mileage by a minimum of 10% reduces engine wear; reduces or eliminates engine wear at startup; reduces engine corrosion; extends engine life; and reduces emissions. The agency's complaint also alleges that the defendants falsely represent that the results of the CRC L38 test proved that zMax: increases gas mileage; reduces engine wear; extends engine life; lowers fuel consumption by 8.5% lowers wear on valve stems by 66% lowers wear on piston skirts by 60%; and cuts carbon build-up on valve stems by 66%. From 2003 : The Reversal • zMAX soaks into metal. • zMAX reduces friction. • zMAX increases horsepower. • zMAX dissipates engine heat. • zMAX helps to improve or restore gas mileage and reduce emissions in older cars, by virtue of reducing engine deposits. • zMAX helps to maintain gas mileage and emissions in newer cars, by virtue of reducing engine deposits. • zMAX helps to reduce engine wear on engine valve-stems and guides and piston rings and skirts, by virtue of reducing engine deposits. • zMAX helps to extend engine life, by virtue of reducing engine deposits. Big Difference in what they were saying and what they can now say, IMO. David. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tekheavy Posted August 6, 2008 Report Share Posted August 6, 2008 I remember back in the day, we used to put a quart of tranny fluid in with the oil to free up sticky lifters and basically make the engine run smoother. Worked good when selling a car with a valve tap. Works kind of like Marvel Mystery Oil. Thats probably what the mystery is. Its just tranny fluid for 15 bucks a quart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColdwaterHotrod Posted August 6, 2008 Report Share Posted August 6, 2008 The SGT block is aluminum... Don't they have replaceable steel sleeves, steel cams, valves, springs, pistons, piston rings, oil rings, wrist pins, etc... ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColdwaterHotrod Posted August 6, 2008 Report Share Posted August 6, 2008 From 2001: The FTC's complaint alleges that the defendants did not possess and rely on reasonable substantiation for the following claims in the infomercial, on the Web site and in brochures that zMax: increases gas mileage; increases gas mileage by a minimum of 10% reduces engine wear; reduces or eliminates engine wear at startup; reduces engine corrosion; extends engine life; and reduces emissions. The agency's complaint also alleges that the defendants falsely represent that the results of the CRC L38 test proved that zMax: increases gas mileage; reduces engine wear; extends engine life; lowers fuel consumption by 8.5% lowers wear on valve stems by 66% lowers wear on piston skirts by 60%; and cuts carbon build-up on valve stems by 66%. From 2003 : The Reversal • zMAX soaks into metal. • zMAX reduces friction. • zMAX increases horsepower. • zMAX dissipates engine heat. • zMAX helps to improve or restore gas mileage and reduce emissions in older cars, by virtue of reducing engine deposits. • zMAX helps to maintain gas mileage and emissions in newer cars, by virtue of reducing engine deposits. • zMAX helps to reduce engine wear on engine valve-stems and guides and piston rings and skirts, by virtue of reducing engine deposits. • zMAX helps to extend engine life, by virtue of reducing engine deposits. Big Difference in what they were saying and what they can now say, IMO. David. I agree, the Percentages & Terminology is what got them in trouble & forced them to pay back in 2001. I think they had to submit scientific research from a 3rd party to prove their claims. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moabman Posted August 6, 2008 Report Share Posted August 6, 2008 Don't they have replaceable steel sleeves, steel cams, valves, springs, pistons, piston rings, oil rings, wrist pins, etc... ? I had always assumed this was the case but then I couldn't put my hands on the documentation of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ingram4868 Posted August 6, 2008 Report Share Posted August 6, 2008 I hope they take on that Tornado guy next that claims such great gas mileage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Hawkins Posted August 7, 2008 Report Share Posted August 7, 2008 I hope they take on that Tornado guy next that claims such great gas mileage. WHAT...................... what are you trying to say? Huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
goakley1 Posted August 7, 2008 Report Share Posted August 7, 2008 I gotta tell ya... I put zMax in my car at the last oil change and have found a dramatic LOSS of gas mileage. I used to get 21 to 22 around town. I now struggle to get 20 around town. I can wait to get to the next oil change and hopefully that stuff will go away with the draining of old Mobil 1... Gary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
svtkeith Posted August 8, 2008 Report Share Posted August 8, 2008 A good rule of thumb ....if it's too good to be true....it usually is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GLHS0136 Posted August 8, 2008 Report Share Posted August 8, 2008 I had a beater 1985 Toyota Camry as a commuter car in 1999. I bought it from the origianl owner for $650 to leave in the train staion parking lot each morning so my Roush Mustang wouldn't have to. The car had a low end knock for years according to the orig owner. He said it was oil filter dependent on how loud it would be. I used ZMAX in it after learning about it, Carroll endorsing it and adding it to every Series 1 that left the factory. When that rod let go and went through the bottom of the block (when i had my foot in it), the car continued to run on no oil and at highway speeds for over 5 miles into town. Started even the day i put it on my trailer to take it to the junk yard. Never seized. I bought my Shelby Dakota in 1999. It had 4,500 miles on it. Sat for 9 years in a warehouse in Washington before I got it. Drove it to Ca where it needed smogged. It was 1 point from failing HC. It remained this way every 2 years when I would smog it with up to almost 10K on the clock. 2 trips over the grapevine to Van Nuys too. In 2006 I added ZMAX oil and fuel before going to the SAAC X in Vegas. Came back for a smog. Levels dropped to normal. Had it smogged last month with 11k miles, still good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RStangsOC Posted August 8, 2008 Report Share Posted August 8, 2008 I gotta tell ya... I put zMax in my car at the last oil change and have found a dramatic LOSS of gas mileage. I used to get 21 to 22 around town. I now struggle to get 20 around town. I can wait to get to the next oil change and hopefully that stuff will go away with the draining of old Mobil 1... Gary Not sure about your state, but I believe that here in California the forumla for gas changes during the year (winter versus summer). I dont pay much attention to my mileage - but have heard friends that track mileage complain that they get different mileage during the winter than during the summer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shelby07 Posted August 11, 2008 Report Share Posted August 11, 2008 I got a can of slick 50 for sale.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SGT/SC#0471 Posted August 15, 2008 Report Share Posted August 15, 2008 IMHO from working with heat treated steel, I think zMax's claim works similar to case hardening of steel. I’m not sure what grade our steel is for the engine blocks, but the surface of flame-hardened medium-carbon type steel will have a poorer wear resistance then that of the same piece of steel with a higher richness of carbon-content of equal hardness. Most mild steels do not contain enough carbon in them to be able to just heat them up to make them harder. You can force carbon into the skin of metal to produce a piece of mild steel which has a harder outer casing containing more carbon than its inner core. Granted our internals don’t turn cherry red or bright red like they do doing heat treat but I think the theroy is close. I think zMax has found a way which allows this micro lube to soak into the outer surface when the motor & parts get hot (just like in the commercial). During Heat treating you can produce a carbon rich skin on metal to a case thickness of about 1mm thick. Case hardening is used to add hardness to outside or resist wear and tear, but yet it’s softer on the inside to resist shock or sudden blows. If carbonization can be done to metal, why do you have a hard time believing that someone can’t figure out a way to allow a micro-lubricant to be absorbed into metal when heated up? Personally I think it does work because I have cross sectioned many parts & looked at them under a microscope in a lab to verify the induction of carbon into them for warranty claims & if carbon can be added to the skin so can a micro lubricant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.