08SGT1977 Posted July 30, 2008 Report Share Posted July 30, 2008 http://forums.bradbarnett.net/gallery/show...8&catid=286 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikewheels Posted July 30, 2008 Report Share Posted July 30, 2008 Looks like GT500 owners will have something to grumble about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
moabman Posted July 30, 2008 Report Share Posted July 30, 2008 I think I see bigger brakes on that close-up of the front wheels! If that's true Ford deserves a big pat on the back :happy feet: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Son of GT Posted July 30, 2008 Report Share Posted July 30, 2008 With all due respect, I believe that is a photoshopped version of the car; an artist's rendition if you will. Someone took one of the camoflauged car photos, removed (edited) the front bra, and then speculated what was underneath it. I have seen the 2010, and while this picture is close (let's just say that it's in the stadium), it's not spot on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rpretzel Posted July 30, 2008 Report Share Posted July 30, 2008 With all due respect, I believe that is a photoshopped version of the car; an artist's rendition if you will. Someone took one of the camaflauged car photos, removed (edited) the front bra, and then speculated what was underneath it. I have seen the 2010, and while this picture is close (let's just say that it's in the stadium), it's not spot on. +1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
08SGT1977 Posted July 30, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 30, 2008 With all due respect, I believe that is a photoshopped version of the car; an artist's rendition if you will. Someone took one of the camaflauged car photos, removed (edited) the front bra, and then speculated what was underneath it. I have seen the 2010, and while this picture is close (let's just say that it's in the stadium), it's not spot on. Yes it is - thanks for catching that. After reading the background thread on TMS, it is an edited photo of a test mule. Sorry for any unnecessary anxieties! I don't think it will be far off however... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SLB8SNK Posted July 30, 2008 Report Share Posted July 30, 2008 Sorry, so far nothing on the 2010 looks like a must have for me. Matter of fact, I like none of the thus far softer edges that I see. Bottom line, I just don't see anything significant enough to care about, and what I do see does not thrill me. I will always think that other than the 60-70 models, the current body says the most! Just my .02 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ingram4868 Posted July 30, 2008 Report Share Posted July 30, 2008 Looks like GT500 owners will have something to grumble about. Not me!!! I know what happens when I push my throttle to the floor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColdwaterHotrod Posted July 30, 2008 Report Share Posted July 30, 2008 even if it's close, can you say GT-350 & not 500? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cobramach1 Posted July 30, 2008 Report Share Posted July 30, 2008 With all due respect, I believe that is a photoshopped version of the car; an artist's rendition if you will. Someone took one of the camaflauged car photos, removed (edited) the front bra, and then speculated what was underneath it. That was the first thing I noticed too and not a good job of photoshopping either! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilmor Posted July 31, 2008 Report Share Posted July 31, 2008 I hope it looks better than that, personally! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.