AH64DFlyboy Posted March 10, 2013 Report Share Posted March 10, 2013 So I am also a member of GTR Forum and was talking about 14 mile times and I was happy to share mine with them. in September I drove to ALabama and one weekend I ran it and I ran 11.6 @131 Stock. I don't know why people cant believe my time? WHat times are everyone else running? I did have 109 octane but didn't have a tune for the race gas. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
svtkeith Posted March 10, 2013 Report Share Posted March 10, 2013 So I am also a member of GTR Forum and was talking about 14 mile times and I was happy to share mine with them. in September I drove to ALabama and one weekend I ran it and I ran 11.6 @131 Stock. I don't know why people cant believe my time? WHat times are everyone else running? I did have 109 octane but didn't have a tune for the race gas. That is without dought an awesome 1/4 mile time...congrats!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AH64DFlyboy Posted March 10, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 10, 2013 That is without dought an awesome 1/4 mile time...congrats!! Thanks it just upsets me. I didnt go around posting it I posted a video and was asked if I ran it and if I did what did it do. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myfast70 Posted March 10, 2013 Report Share Posted March 10, 2013 (edited) I would like to see the time slip and a video! Snorman & NJTony off of SVT are the two fastest GT500's I've seen yet and are only knocking on 128mph. Easy to see why you would be doubted. Edited March 10, 2013 by myfast70 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AH64DFlyboy Posted March 10, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 10, 2013 I am trying to find all my time slips. I was in a course for the ARmy when I ran it. I am still looking but so far this is the only one I have found. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
svtkeith Posted March 10, 2013 Report Share Posted March 10, 2013 Thanks it just upsets me. I didnt go around posting it I posted a video and was asked if I ran it and if I did what did it do. I've learned a long time ago that people will dought you no matter what...IMO as long as YOU know you did it with a fully stock GT500 is all that should matter to you..the hell what someone else thinks or don't think..just my two cents!!. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
svt13 Posted March 10, 2013 Report Share Posted March 10, 2013 Maybe they think you are doing it stock on race gas? Do they know the power mods you added? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AH64DFlyboy Posted March 10, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 10, 2013 Maybe they think you are doing it stock on race gas? Do they know the power mods you added? Yes but I did this before I added everything. So I dont know what it would run now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AH64DFlyboy Posted March 10, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 10, 2013 SVT13 do you have any pics of the carbon spliter you added? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2010KonaBlueGT Posted March 11, 2013 Report Share Posted March 11, 2013 I did have 109 octane but didn't have a tune for the race gas. With Knock Sensor (KS) technology, your car WILL run better on higher octane fuel. I personally have never seen a established drag strips trap speed be off. That *is* a very impressive MPH and still yet, a VERY impressive ET. With the poor 60' you say you had, I'm surprised you pulled that kind of ET as well. Which tells me you were laying down a TON of torque and horsepower. Phill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
devious_stang Posted March 11, 2013 Report Share Posted March 11, 2013 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Helix Posted March 11, 2013 Report Share Posted March 11, 2013 Jeeze, 109 octane. Yea, it'll do that. No tune, true, but running in a straight line all your worried about is energy yield. 109 will do it, that's for sure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucky13 Posted March 11, 2013 Report Share Posted March 11, 2013 (edited) WOW! My 13' SS 850 made 747WHP/625TQ and after 12 passes the best trap speed I could manage was a 128MPH at Royal Purple raceway...and my passes where on M/T ET Streets....what gives ?!?!?! ...... But I did the math and if you trap in the high 120's low 130's and with a good 60' you should be in the mid 10's! Edited March 11, 2013 by Lucky13 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2010KonaBlueGT Posted March 11, 2013 Report Share Posted March 11, 2013 WOW! My 13' SS 850 made 747WHP/625TQ and after 12 passes the best trap speed I could manage was a 128MPH at Royal Purple raceway...and my passes where on M/T ET Streets....what gives ?!?!?! ...... But I did the math and if you trap in the high 120's low 130's and with a good 60' you should be in the mid 10's! Key words: "with a good 60' (time)" Phill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
svt13 Posted March 11, 2013 Report Share Posted March 11, 2013 SVT13 do you have any pics of the carbon spliter you added? check my gallery. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AH64DFlyboy Posted March 11, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2013 Haa yea good 60 is the key word! I couldnt hook at all. my buddy said it was funny watching. 1st was like the car sitting still almost and when I shift to second he was like it was gone. This was the stock HP and TQ numbers. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AH64DFlyboy Posted March 11, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2013 I was a little disappointed cause after I put the ATI15% and65 mm Cobra jet monoblade TB HP only went up to 654 rwhp and 650 FT tq But Jon had to retard the timing below stock since I was getting detonation Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iceman5000 Posted March 11, 2013 Report Share Posted March 11, 2013 I was a little disappointed cause after I put the ATI15% and65 mm Cobra jet monoblade TB HP only went up to 654 rwhp and 650 FT tq But Jon had to retard the timing below stock since I was getting detonation There is no such thing as a 65mm CJ Monoblade. There is a 65 mm TB, and there is a CJ Monoblade TB. Which is it? I am at 660 RWHP, with a CJ Monoblade and Lund tune. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AH64DFlyboy Posted March 11, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2013 There is no such thing as a 65mm CJ Monoblade. There is a 65 mm TB, and there is a CJ Monoblade TB. Which is it? I am at 660 RWHP, with a CJ Monoblade and Lund tune. Ford Racing Cobra Jet Monoblade Throttle Body (M-9926-SCJ)I thought it was 65mm? you are at 660rwhp with just the TB and a tune? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AH64DFlyboy Posted March 11, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 11, 2013 after the ATI 15% and Ford racing monoblade. I have to get it on a dyno tune before I run it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iceman5000 Posted March 12, 2013 Report Share Posted March 12, 2013 Ford Racing Cobra Jet Monoblade Throttle Body (M-9926-SCJ)I thought it was 65mm? you are at 660rwhp with just the TB and a tune? Yep. You should be at least 25 HP more with ATI 15%. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AH64DFlyboy Posted March 12, 2013 Author Report Share Posted March 12, 2013 I am guessing with the timing retarded below stock that is hurting my Rwhp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.