terryj Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 May be a a misprint in the supplement. Shelby Supplement 31.pdf Shelby Supplement 31.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torched10 Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 May be a a misprint in the supplement. looks like a 2010--shows a 3:55 rear,vs 3:73 for 2011 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
terryj Posted July 20, 2010 Author Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 looks like a 2010--shows a 3:55 rear,vs 3:73 for 2011 The 3:55's come stock on a 2011 without the SVT Performance Package. I was looking at some of randymarble's photos and it looks like the DS is aluminum. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kpevin Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 The 2010 supplement says its aluminum (page 29) and its not, so i would assume the 2011 isnt either. But you never know.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ezareth Posted July 20, 2010 Report Share Posted July 20, 2010 As much as I'm hoping it is, I know it is not since the weight savings of 30 lbs would have been widely touted by SVT. This is the first performance mod I'm doing to my shelby. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KEYSTONE Posted July 21, 2010 Report Share Posted July 21, 2010 May be a a misprint in the supplement. Anyone try a magnet on it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.