svttim Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 His job approval is on the downturn. Unless he makes changes, he will not e re elected. And, I actually agree with you, most of this is none of his doing, or for that matter, Bush's. A lot of what is going on has to do with Clintons decision on housing loans, corperate greed, energy prices and a host of other issues. That being said, destroying wall street is not the answer either and everytime someone in his administration opens there mouth, the market goes down. I will promise you this, if he starts doing some of the things he said he would do, like eliminating pork barrel spending, I will be the first to praise him for doing the right thing, as I did on Iraq. But, no more excuses for not carrying through on promises, no more double talk when he says the same things he critisized McCain for saying. No more politics as usual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSSNAKE Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 ??? Obama has strong numbers. 85% believe he inherited this mess. He has a 61% approval rating. 75% believe he's making the right decsisons on the economy. 10% believe the fall in the economy was his fault and 20% believe he's making the wrong decisions. So - ignoring the numbers means...??? 85% “believing” doesn’t necessarily make it so. The president’s approval rating taken in the last 2 wks has averaged 60.9% but we’ll give ya that 1/10 of a percent. :angel: Actually, what the president does (or not) isn’t the only concern as Congress has a hand in all of this too averaging a 52% disapproval rate. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/polls/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
svttim Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 85% “believing” doesn’t necessarily make it so. The president’s approval rating taken in the last 2 wks has averaged 60.9% but we’ll give ya that 1/10 of a percent. :angel: Actually, what the president does (or not) isn’t the only concern as Congress has a hand in all of this too averaging a 52% disapproval rate. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/polls/ Rassmussen has 56/43 for Obama, not great numbers for a new President but, much higher than congress and I agree, they are a big problem Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
one_quik_pony Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 NO, we do not, "have you wrong". We, understand the words/statements of a Socialist/Marxist's, who along with your China, Russian and Cuban comrades want to take our great Country into Socialism and then Communism. We, Patriotic Americans, tried to warn other voters of Obama's TRUE Agenda, but were ignored or were called, Racists. It was not Obama's skin color, that we had issue with, it was, and is, Obama's belief that America needs to be radically changed and should be a Socialist/Communist Country, if not in total, at least in the manner of other Socialist/Communist modern practices/views, currently followed by the , 'Big 4'. Sadly, now millions of Americans, can see the Far Left Socialist agenda of Obama and his tax, tax, and Nationalize, Socialist/Marxist thugs, in action. Instead of trying to reverse your Leftist Propaganda posts, why don't you go use your food stamps and buy some twinkles and cool aide, sit on your Obama Pray rug, and worship, your Socialist/Marxist God, Obama, Obama, Obama, and stop trying to convince anyone on his Forum, that you give a Damn about the United States, or the Free Market, or the private ownership principles America was founded on. Apparently 66.882.230 Americans were tired of trying it "your way"! You call yourself a patriot? You need not like him, but you should respect him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSSNAKE Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 Rassmussen has 56/43 for Obama, not great numbers for a new President but, much higher than congress and I agree, they are a big problem Yes and look at the Fox News data that is always poo-pooed by the left it may appear a little more "Fair and balanced" to them now. http://www.realclearpolitics.com/polls/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
svttim Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 Apparently 66.882.230 Americans were tired of trying it "your way"! You call yourself a patriot? You need not like him, but you should respect him. You need respect the office, not the man. Respect for the man is an earned thing. And, how much respect did we see for the last president Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
one_quik_pony Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 ??? Obama has strong numbers. 85% believe he inherited this mess. He has a 61% approval rating. 75% believe he's making the right decsisons on the economy. 10% believe the fall in the economy was his fault and 20% believe he's making the wrong decisions. So - ignoring the numbers means...??? Who were the 10% that think he CAUSED this mess...victims of a frontal limbaughtomy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
svttim Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 Who were the 10% that think he CAUSED this mess...victims of a frontal limbaughtomy? He has casued a part of this but, the vast majority is not of his doing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
one_quik_pony Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 You need respect the office, not the man. Respect for the man is an earned thing. And, how much respect did we see for the last president The man is the Commander-in-Chief. He represents the office of President. He deserves respect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
one_quik_pony Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 He has casued a part of this but, the vast majority is not of his doing Which part did he cause? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilmor Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 You need respect the office, not the man. Respect for the man is an earned thing. And, how much respect did we see for the last president Agree, 100%!! If we were required to only respect the man, Nixon might still be in office! We might not have been able to complain about Clinton and Lewinsky! We couldn't have thought of Carter as being a joke! I respect the office of President; that's why I continue to be upset that Obama is sitting in it because so far everything he has done has reduced my respect of him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
one_quik_pony Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 Agree, 100%!! If we were required to only respect the man, Nixon might still be in office! We might not have been able to complain about Clinton and Lewinsky! We couldn't have thought of Carter as being a joke! I respect the office of President; that's why I continue to be upset that Obama is sitting in it because so far everything he has done has reduced my respect of him. ONLY respect the man? How did you read that into it? Why didn't YOU run? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDT Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 I respect the office of President; that's why I continue to be upset that Obama is sitting in it because so far everything he has done has reduced my respect of him. If you have no respect for him how can it be reduced?????????????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
svttim Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 If you have no respect for him how can it be reduced?????????????? Just funny how we are now suppose to respect the chosen one but, the rules are changed from last year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSSNAKE Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 Apparently 66.882.230 Americans were tired of trying it "your way"! You call yourself a patriot? You need not like him, but you should respect him. Well, time will tell which way they’d rather have it and one thing’s for sure; that if they showed the respect paid to Bush X 100,000 they would be insulting him (Obama). What some in/out of the media did to Bush during the campaign and at Obama’s inauguration was criminal. Of course you can’t TELL another to respect the president and expect it to happen but by virtue of his position he should be SHOWN respect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDT Posted March 16, 2009 Report Share Posted March 16, 2009 Well, time will tell which way they’d rather have it and one thing’s for sure; that if they showed the respect paid to Bush X 100,000 they would be insulting him (Obama). What some in/out of the media did to Bush during the campaign and at Obama’s inauguration was criminal. Of course you can’t TELL another to respect the president and expect it to happen but by virtue of his position he should be SHOWN respect. Bush could be thankful that he was not "IMPEACHED"????????????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDT Posted March 17, 2009 Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 Just funny how we are now suppose to respect the chosen one but, the rules are changed from last year Ha now I think there was more reason to "IMPEACH" G.W. than Clinton???????????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSSNAKE Posted March 17, 2009 Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 Bush could be thankful that he was not "IMPEACHED"????????????? If the evidence is there and Congress votes yes, impeach away. So what your saying is that you agree with me that the President of the United States should be SHOWN respect? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDT Posted March 17, 2009 Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 If the evidence is there and Congress votes yes, impeach away. So what your saying is that you agree with me that the President of the United States should be SHOWN respect? Yes.............And I also believe that if Bush was Democrat he would have been "IMPEACHED"........... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ilmor Posted March 17, 2009 Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 ONLY respect the man? How did you read that into it? Why didn't YOU run? You stated above "You need not like him, but you should respect him". I respect the OFFICE, but not the man, until he earns it. My respect for Obama is in a downward spiral at the moment. I did not run because I have no desire to do so. Why didn't you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSSNAKE Posted March 17, 2009 Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 Yes.............And I also believe that if Bush was Democrat he would have been "IMPEACHED"........... So you’re saying that Democrats screw up more often than Republicans? Actually, Clinton was Impeach because there WAS evidence and Congress voted to impeach. The circumstances around who did what to who's blue dress was unimportant. Congress felt there was evidence beyond a reasonable bout that he lied so he WAS impeached. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
69dejavue Posted March 17, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 Actually, I think it was a little over 66 million. Probably closer to 6.6 million. they just registered to vote ten times each through ACORN. It was Josef Stalin, another communist, that said it matters not who votes. It matters only who counts the votes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
69dejavue Posted March 17, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 The man is the Commander-in-Chief. He represents the office of President. He deserves respect. As far as Commander-in Chief; rank is something you wear. Respect is something you earn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDT Posted March 17, 2009 Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 So you’re saying that Democrats screw up more often than Republicans? Actually, Clinton was Impeach because there WAS evidence and Congress voted to impeach. The circumstances around who did what to who's blue dress was unimportant. Congress felt there was evidence beyond a reasonable bout that he lied so he WAS impeached. No........I am saying that Republicans are more "P ED" than Democrats when the opposing party is in the White House............... But looks like their #s and power are shrinking.................. Also your saying Bush did not lie?????????????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSSNAKE Posted March 17, 2009 Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 No........I am saying that Republicans are more "P ED" than Democrats when the opposing party is in the White House............... But looks like their #s and power are shrinking.................. That depends on who the "opposing party" is. Well see, they'll learn to be patient, it's only about another 3 years 7 months and 3 weeks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
69dejavue Posted March 17, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 I am curious (yellow). When did Bush lie? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skiph Posted March 17, 2009 Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 The University of Chicago recount officially had Gore the winner of Florida............. :rolleyes: OK. This is brand new data to me. Weather or not this is true, or how it was done, I have a question...... Question: If the count/recount is done <X> number of times where X > 3, and ONE time of the many is different then all the others, which count is correct? - The first count? - The last count? - The result that comes up every time except the ONE? If your answer is "the last count" is that because it came out the way you wanted? And if so, and there was ANOTHER count, and it does not come up the way you wanted, what would the answer be? Really. Time to get over it and move on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSSNAKE Posted March 17, 2009 Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 Also your saying Bush did not lie?????????????? I don't know you'll have to ask him. If that is the main "war crime" that he is charged with and IF THERE IS EVIDENCE I am more than confident that the Democrat leadership will ask for a vote; if not for all intent and purposes it never happened. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSSNAKE Posted March 17, 2009 Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 The University of Leftists recount officially had Gore the owner of Global warming (and the internet)............. :rolleyes: DUDE, NO WAY! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDT Posted March 17, 2009 Report Share Posted March 17, 2009 DUDE, NO WAY! "BLASPHEMY"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You "SUCK" at changing quotes too.................... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.