69dejavue Posted March 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 NO, we do not, "have you wrong". We, understand the words/statements of a Socialist/Marxist's, who along with your China, Russian and Cuban comrades want to take our great Country into Socialism and then Communism. We, Patriotic Americans, tried to warn other voters of Obama's TRUE Agenda, but were ignored or were called, Racists. It was not Obama's skin color, that we had issue with, it was, and is, Obama's belief that America needs to be radically changed and should be a Socialist/Communist Country, if not in total, at least in the manner of other Socialist/Communist modern practices/views, currently followed by the , 'Big 4'. Sadly, now millions of Americans, can see the Far Left Socialist agenda of Obama and his tax, tax, and Nationalize, Socialist/Marxist thugs, in action. Instead of trying to reverse your Leftist Propaganda posts, why don't you go use your food stamps and buy some twinkles and cool aide, sit on your Obama Pray rug, and worship, your Socialist/Marxist God, Obama, Obama, Obama, and stop trying to convince anyone on his Forum, that you give a Damn about the United States, or the Free Market, or the private ownership principles America was founded on. Socialism is just communism with a graduate degree. If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck....guess what .......its a duck. It is so sorry to see people on this site that obviously advocate socialism or communism. And they must if they defend obama, pelosi, et al. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CobraCrazy Posted March 14, 2009 Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 Socialism is just communism with a graduate degree. If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck....guess what .......its a duck. It is so sorry to see people on this site that obviously advocate socialism or communism. And they must if they defend obama, pelosi, et al. I thought Joe McCarthy was dead, but here he is writing a post on Team Shelby? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SGT/SC#0471 Posted March 14, 2009 Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 Now we can use this map to start secession. Thats funny. Talk about doing us a favor here in the PNW... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
69dejavue Posted March 14, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 14, 2009 Thats funny. Talk about doing us a favor here in the PNW... Mc, yes sadly CA, WA, OR will be a blue liberal state. You can keep the welfare, illegal immigrant assylum cities, etc. Sadly the red states will not bail out the blue states in a few years after this happens. The first secession was not a matter of race but rather a difference of opinion on the form of government. The second seccession should not be racially motivated either. Rather it should be based on those that disagree with the current form of government and want out. Why should a group of people that are vehemently opposed to a form of government be forced to endure this slippery slide into socialism? Why should they not be allowed to leave if they want? I thought it was only Russia that uses force to keep states inline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackhawkpilot Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Wait until they "Legalize" 30 million illegal aliens. They will be in power forever. They won't stay in power forever, and if they keep fuggin' up by the numbers, their time will come sooner than later. Check out this excerpt from a certain Constitution.... "All power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority and instituted for their peace, safety, happiness and the protection of property. For the advancement of these ends, they have at all times an inalienable and indefeasible right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may deem proper." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDT Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 They won't stay in power forever, and if they keep fuggin' up by the numbers, their time will come sooner than later. Check out this excerpt from a certain Constitution.... "All power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority and instituted for their peace, safety, happiness and the protection of property. For the advancement of these ends, they have at all times an inalienable and indefeasible right to alter, reform or abolish their government in such manner as they may deem proper." Not sure about the "ABOLISH GOVERNMENT PART"??????????? But Flooding our Southern Borders with US Armed National Guard would Sure Help!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackhawkpilot Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 True. If the politicians would stay out of our business and let us win this war, we would be able to spare some forces for internal/border protection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDT Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 True. If the politicians would stay out of our business and let us win this war, we would be able to spare some forces for internal/border protection. When was the last time we saw US FORCES at the Borders even when we could spare them????????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SGT/SC#0471 Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 NO, we do not, "have you wrong". We, understand the words/statements of a Socialist/Marxist's, who along with your China, Russian and Cuban comrades want to take our great Country into Socialism and then Communism. We, Patriotic Americans, tried to warn other voters of Obama's TRUE Agenda, but were ignored or were called, Racists. It was not Obama's skin color, that we had issue with, it was, and is, Obama's belief that America needs to be radically changed and should be a Socialist/Communist Country, if not in total, at least in the manner of other Socialist/Communist modern practices/views, currently followed by the , 'Big 4'. Sadly, now millions of Americans, can see the Far Left Socialist agenda of Obama and his tax, tax, and Nationalize, Socialist/Marxist thugs, in action. Instead of trying to reverse your Leftist Propaganda posts, why don't you go use your food stamps and buy some twinkles and cool aide, sit on your Obama Pray rug, and worship, your Socialist/Marxist God, Obama, Obama, Obama, and stop trying to convince anyone on his Forum, that you give a Damn about the United States, or the Free Market, or the private ownership principles America was founded on. I guess Warren Buffett and Bill Gates should use their food stamps?...why does everyone think that Obama voters are poor? Why can't you just be patriotic and support our President, he won now lets move on so we don't sink... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SGT/SC#0471 Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Mc, yes sadly CA, WA, OR will be a blue liberal state. You can keep the welfare, illegal immigrant assylum cities, etc. Sadly the red states will not bail out the blue states in a few years after this happens. The first secession was not a matter of race but rather a difference of opinion on the form of government. The second seccession should not be racially motivated either. Rather it should be based on those that disagree with the current form of government and want out. Why should a group of people that are vehemently opposed to a form of government be forced to endure this slippery slide into socialism? Why should they not be allowed to leave if they want? I thought it was only Russia that uses force to keep states inline. 69 fact is I fully support you, in fact I would vote for PNW to become its own country, the SW it's own and the NE and the SE there ya go I know we would be better off here...4 countries and there it is... Washington State the Switzerland of the USA! So 69 what state are you in? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDT Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Socialism is just communism with a graduate degree. If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck....guess what .......its a duck. It is so sorry to see people on this site that obviously advocate socialism or communism. And they must if they defend obama, pelosi, et al. And you are the "McCARTHYISM DUCK"!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GT500FLYBOY Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 The map just underscores the obvious. The educated urban, suburban, and exurban parts of the country simply out voted the rural and uneducated parts of the country. What's so astonishing about that? And those who claim to be 'patriots' want to secede? Somewhat of a contradiction and ironic, no? Again - if you don't like our democracy and our country you can leave - but you don't get to break it up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDT Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Thats what I kept telling them....."VOTE FOR THE CANDIDATE WITH THE HIGHER IQ"...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
69dejavue Posted March 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Actually what it showed was the uneducated inner cities and the crime ridden inner cities carried the vote in the election. Your suburbs are still more likely to vote moderate to conservative. Refer back to the initial statistics re the homicide rate. It is a shame the liberals keep telling everyone they are so much more intelligent than everyone else. At least they believe it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GT500FLYBOY Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Actually what it showed was the uneducated inner cities and the crime ridden inner cities carried the vote in the election. Your suburbs are still more likely to vote moderate to conservative. Refer back to the initial statistics re the homicide rate. It is a shame the liberals keep telling everyone they are so much more intelligent than everyone else. At least they believe it. Uh, no. The population you refer to generally always votes for a Democratic candidate. Just as the rural population generally always votes for the Republican. They cancel each other out. The difference in this election was the suburban, and exurban educated white guy. As far as intelligence, why is it that the majority of the academia is Democratic? Maybe they know more - and are less ignorant? Why is it that thru all of history the fascists take out academia first? It makes it easier to propagandize the masses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueone Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GT500FLYBOY Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 That's pretty good. Sad commentary on the average voter. Though the same is true no matter what party affiliation. This video only tells one facet of the story, but that was your objective. Ignoring other party voters. hmmm, ignoring...equates to...??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueone Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 That's pretty good. Sad commentary on the average voter. Though the same is true no matter what party affiliation. This video only tells one facet of the story, but that was your objective. Ignoring other party voters. hmmm, ignoring...equates to...??? You might be right, I will look around and see if I can find one that backs up your point though it might take awhile, and as far as ignoring goes I guess I would be a much happier man if I didn't realize what's going on with our leadership, some might call it blissfully ignorant. Kinda like a dog on the interstate having a good ol time because he can't see what's about to happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GT500FLYBOY Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 You might be right, I will look around and see if I can find one that backs up your point though it might take awhile, and as far as ignoring goes I guess I would be a much happier man if I didn't realize what's going on with our leadership, some might call it blissfully ignorant. Kinda like a dog on the interstate having a good ol time because he can't see what's about to happen. That's what frustrates me the most. The fact that someone of your caliber missed your calling. Your clear vision and certainty as to what should and shouldn't be done. I'm sure there must be a way for us to somehow put you in touch with the powers that be. You need to make them understand that you know what needs to be done to stop this train wreck. I can't believe they haven't already tried to engage you. Come on - spill the beans - they have, haven't they! Why be so coy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blueone Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 That's what frustrates me the most. The fact that someone of your caliber missed your calling. Your clear vision and certainty as to what should and shouldn't be done. I'm sure there must be a way for us to somehow put you in touch with the powers that be. You need to make them understand that you know what needs to be done to stop this train wreck. I can't believe they haven't already tried to engage you. Come on - spill the beans - they have, haven't they! Why be so coy? Ok, you got me. I see now that there is no way I can compete with you in a coy contest and I was a fool to try. I'm also sorry that I frustrated you, though I disagree with your politics I will say that you have a nice car and I hope that maybe one day Obama will decide to start a share the GT500's program and them maybe we can all have one. Game over I quit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
69dejavue Posted March 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Uh, no. The population you refer to generally always votes for a Democratic candidate. Just as the rural population generally always votes for the Republican. They cancel each other out. The difference in this election was the suburban, and exurban educated white guy. As far as intelligence, why is it that the majority of the academia is Democratic? Maybe they know more - and are less ignorant? Why is it that thru all of history the fascists take out academia first? It makes it easier to propagandize the masses. Yes, in this election there were more suburban and exurban educated white voters that voted for obama. That was based on the economy at the time of the election. People voted with their wallets. Bush had a graduate degree from Harvard. Hard to be more academia than that. SO PEOPLE THAT DO NOT HAVE POST GRADUATE DEGREES FROM AN IVY LEAGUE SCHOOL ARE IGNORANT? When it comes time to propagandize the masses that is done by the communists and socialists. Thank you for making my point. It is disgraceful to say to those on this site that because one does not have the graduate degree from an Ivy League School are ignorant. Intelligence is not measured by degrees. And there is a difference between intelligence and common sense. There must be a balance. Jimmy Carter is an excellent example. Carter was very intelligent but a buffoon of a president. Klinton was intelligent and......no morals, no scruples, etc. Kerry, Kennedy, ........educated but again a lack of morals and scruples. And since obama has had more controversy with his cabinet selections than anyone in recent memory it would appear that your party does lack morals and scruples, and then tries to give them cabinet positions. Again, it is sad that you take it upon yourself to measure a person's intelligence based on how they vote rather than how and why they think. The democrats seem to constantly tell us how intelligent they are as though it is a bragging right even if not confirmed. But I am amazed at your arrogance in proclaiming that people that vote democrat are automatically more intelligent. Then again, I should not be surprised. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GT500FLYBOY Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Yes, in this election there were more suburban and exurban educated white voters that voted for obama. That was based on the economy at the time of the election. People voted with their wallets. Bush had a graduate degree from Harvard. Hard to be more academia than that. SO PEOPLE THAT DO NOT HAVE POST GRADUATE DEGREES FROM AN IVY LEAGUE SCHOOL ARE IGNORANT? When it comes time to propagandize the masses that is done by the communists and socialists. Thank you for making my point. It is disgraceful to say to those on this site that because one does not have the graduate degree from an Ivy League School are ignorant. Intelligence is not measured by degrees. And there is a difference between intelligence and common sense. There must be a balance. Jimmy Carter is an excellent example. Carter was very intelligent but a buffoon of a president. Klinton was intelligent and......no morals, no scruples, etc. Kerry, Kennedy, ........educated but again a lack of morals and scruples. And since obama has had more controversy with his cabinet selections than anyone in recent memory it would appear that your party does lack morals and scruples, and then tries to give them cabinet positions. Again, it is sad that you take it upon yourself to measure a person's intelligence based on how they vote rather than how and why they think. Actually, I agree with some of what you said. Though it's best to recognize that there are no absolutes, there are always exceptions to the rule. That's the problem - you want to take anecdotal evidence and make it the rule. That would tend to be ignoring the...and well...you can finish this... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
svttim Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 I admit, I underestimated Obama I failed to see how much he could screw things up in such a short time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDT Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 The "WHINING" is "RELENTLESS" here!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
69dejavue Posted March 15, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Actually, I agree with some of what you said. Though it's best to recognize that there are no absolutes, there are always exceptions to the rule. That's the problem - you want to take anecdotal evidence and make it the rule. That would tend to be ignoring the...and well...you can finish this... You say there are no absolutes yet you proclaim that most academia is democrat and appear to say that democrats are more intelligent. Is that what you are saying? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
svttim Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 The "WHINING" is "RELENTLESS" here!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Now, we've talked about this substanance thing before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GT500FLYBOY Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 You say there are no absolutes yet you proclaim that most academia is democrat and appear to say that democrats are more intelligent. Is that what you are saying? ??? You're contradicting yourself. Yes - most academia is Democratic. That's a fact, though not an absolute - hence the word "most". The only absolute here - your interpretation of what I said and subsequent summation that Democrats are more intelligent. I said no such thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
svttim Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 ??? You're contradicting yourself. Yes - most academia is Democratic. That is not an absolute. The only absolute here - your interpretation of what I said and subsequent summation that Democrats are more intelligent. I said no such thing. Actually the majority of people are Democrats becasue thats what they were told by thier parents. And, being part of academia has no bearing on intellegence. Some would argue, the oposite. Those that can, do, those that cant, teach Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
07SGT4578 Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DDT Posted March 15, 2009 Report Share Posted March 15, 2009 Actually the majority of people are Democrats becasue thats what they were told by thier parents. And, being part of academia has no bearing on intellegence. Some would argue, the oposite. Those that can, do, those that cant, teach I didn't listen to my Parents when I registered Republican................ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.